Browsed by
Category: Authorisation

ACCC appeals Tribunal’s Tabcorp/Tatts merger authorisation ?>

ACCC appeals Tribunal’s Tabcorp/Tatts merger authorisation

The ACCC has applied to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the Australian Competition Tribunal’s recent Tabcorp/Tatts merger authorisation decision. Background I outlined the Tribunal’s Tabcorp decision in an earlier blog (Tribunal Clears Tabcorp/Tatts Merger (ACL Blog, 30 June 2017)) and provided some more detailed information and case extracts on my my Tabcorp case page). Briefly the Tribunal has the power to authorise a proposed merger/acquisition (s 95AT) on public benefit grounds, provided satisfied that the ‘proposed acquisition would…

Read More Read More






Tribunal clears Tabcorp/Tatts merger ?>

Tribunal clears Tabcorp/Tatts merger

The Australian Competition Tribunal last week granted authorisation for the proposed Tabcorp/Tatts merger. Legal framework for mergers in Australia The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (s 50) prohibits acquisitions which would have the effect (or likely effect) of substantially lessening competition in any market (with market defined to mean a market for goods or services in Australia or in an Australian State, Territory or region).  There is no obligation for parties to seek competition approval in advance of a merger/acquisition;…

Read More Read More






Apple goes on the attack ?>

Apple goes on the attack

There has been plenty of media this week generated by Apple’s latest submission in response to the application by four banks to collectively bargain and boycott Apple in relation to Apple Pay. Brief re-cap: the story so far The application The saga began in August 2016 when four banks (Cth, Westpac, NAB, Bendigo and Adelaide Bank) sought authorisation to collectively bargain with and boycott Apple in relation to Apple Pay.  The ACCC may grant authorsiation for conduct that would otherwise contravene the…

Read More Read More






Banks denied interim authorisation for cartel conduct ?>

Banks denied interim authorisation for cartel conduct

In an earlier post I noted that that several Australian banks had applied to the ACCC for authorisation to collectively bargain ‘with providers of third-party mobile wallet services [including Apple] on conditions relating to competition, best practice standards, and efficiency and transparency.’ Authorisation and interim authorisation Authorisation may be granted for cartel conduct and other prohibited anti-competitive conduct on public benefit grounds.  Applications typically take up to six months, which allows the ACCC to undertake detailed market studies and full consideration of potential competitive detriment…

Read More Read More






Apple versus the banks ?>

Apple versus the banks

Several Australian banks, including three out of the ‘big four’ banks, want the ACCC to give them the green light to engage in hard-core cartel conduct. The Banks’ submission On 26 July Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, the Commonwealth Bank, NAB and Westpac sought authorisation to engage in collective negotiation with providers of third party mobile wallet services (essentially Apple) and to collectively boycott third-party providers during the course of collective negotiations.  Apple has so far locked out third-party providers, although ANZ (the…

Read More Read More